RE: CfC: return HTML 5.0 to Last Call

I also support it.

From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 2:18 AM
To: Sam Ruby
Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org
Subject: Re: CfC: return HTML 5.0 to Last Call

I support this CFC

--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>

On 6 June 2014 21:33, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net<mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net>> wrote:
In accordance with Plan 2014[1]:

     We think it is likely that the Working Group will make substantive
     changes to the document as a result of Candidate Recommendation
     Review. Therefore, in accordance with the W3C Process, we will
     return to a short Last Call before requesting to advance to
     Proposed Recommendation.

the HTML Chairs are issuing a Call for Consensus to return HTML 5.0 to Last Call.  The document can be found here:

     http://htmlwg.org/heartbeat/WD-html5-20140617/


Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Friday June 13th, this resolution will carry.

The proposed Last Call Working Draft states:

     The scope of Last Call feedback on this specification is limited to
     changes that have taken place during the Candidate Recommendation
     phase[2]. The Last Call period is expected to finish on 15 July
     2014. Once Last Call comments are addressed, the Working Group
     expects to advance this draft to Proposed Recommendation.

Note that some features marked as at risk in the current Candidate Recommendation were removed[3].  The following features remain in the draft at this time but may be removed due to lack of implementation:

     the DataCue interface;
     <input type=time>;
     drag and drop;
     the new ruby model.

- Sam Ruby,
on behalf of the HTML WG co-chairs

[1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html#plan

[2] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?chfield=bug_status&chfieldfrom=2012-12-17&chfieldto=2014-06-17&chfieldvalue=RESOLVED&component=HTML5%20spec&list_id=38742&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced

[3] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24812