- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:48:17 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VkJLmY=sYd0CKbONNArftCkN_Q6ibVoLHrbhDxf_fLPRA@mail.gmail.com>
I have made an edit for review: new text <p>Work on this specification is also done at the <a href="http://www.whatwg.org/">WHATWG</a>. The W3C HTML working group actively pursues convergence of the HTML specification with the WHATWG living standard, within the bounds of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2013/09/html-charter.html">W3C HTML working group charter</a>. There are various ways to follow this work at the WHATWG:</p> -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 2 October 2013 22:58, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Silvia, I would like it to be accurate. Its no longer required by the > charter so that should be struck. I am happy to have a strong statement > that we work to keep the specification of W3C HTML specification and the > WHATWG standard in sync. > > how about this? > > "The W3C HTML working group actively pursues convergence of the > HTML specification with the WHATWG living standard." > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> > > > On 2 October 2013 22:35, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote: > >> It's heaps weaker than the explicit call out before. It's a shame I >> missed that earlier. >> I prefer not to remove that sentence from the spec, Steve, but just >> rephrase it a little. >> Silvia. >> On 3 Oct 2013 00:25, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> The old section 4 became 3.2 and the old content from 3.2 was moved >>> into 3.1. The new wording is meant to be more inclusive of the various >>> groups out there." >>> >>> --Mike >>> >>> Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, 2013-10-02 15:23 +1000: >>> >>> > I only just noticed that section 4 of the previous charter has gone >>> > missing from the new one: >>> > >>> > Previous charter: >>> > http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html >>> > >>> > New charter: >>> > http://www.w3.org/2013/09/html-charter.html >>> > >>> > Supposed to be the diff between the old and the new charter: >>> > http://www.w3.org/2013/09/html-diff.html >>> > BUT it is missing to state that the section about "Relationship to >>> > External Groups" that includes "actively pursue convergence with >>> > WHATWG" is now gone. >>> > >>> > I don't think that is a constructive position and I am not aware that >>> > this was agreed. >>> > >>> > Did that section go by accident or was that on purpose? >>> > If it was on purpose, could somebody link to that discussion for me, >>> please? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Silvia. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:29 PM, <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> wrote: >>> > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23408 >>> > > >>> > > Bug ID: 23408 >>> > > Summary: update text to reflect new charter >>> > > Product: HTML WG >>> > > Version: unspecified >>> > > Hardware: PC >>> > > OS: Windows NT >>> > > Status: NEW >>> > > Severity: normal >>> > > Priority: P2 >>> > > Component: HTML5 spec >>> > > Assignee: dave.null@w3.org >>> > > Reporter: faulkner.steve@gmail.com >>> > > QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org >>> > > CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-admin@w3.org, >>> > > public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org >>> > > >>> > > "The W3C HTML working group actively pursues convergence with the >>> WHATWG, as >>> > > required by the W3C HTML working group charter. There are various >>> ways to >>> > > follow this work at the WHATWG:" >>> > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/ >>> > > >>> > > new charter: http://www.w3.org/2013/09/html-charter.html >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > You are receiving this mail because: >>> > > You are on the CC list for the bug. >>> > > >>> >>> -- >>> Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike >>> >> >
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 09:49:26 UTC