On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > You seem to believe that favoring EME means favoring DRM. I don't believe > > that is true. That DRM is a possible application of EME does not make EME > > bad or wrong and more than use of HTML for porn makes HTML bad or wrong > (for > > those that find porn morally wrong). > > The EME spec is fundamentally about allowing DRM. Trying to pretend > that it's designed for anything else, even if there are nods to > additional uses in the spec, is simply dishonest. Please stop. > DRM is simply one application of EME. It is certainly not the only application. It is not dishonest to point out this fact; however, it is misleading for you to insist that it is the only application.
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 22:45:48 UTC