- From: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:58:58 +0000
- To: public-html-admin@w3.org
Tab Atkins Jr. writes: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Paul Cotton > <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish as a First Public > > Working Draft (FPWD) the following Encrypted Media Extensions > > document: > > > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-media-fpwd.html > > I object to the publication of this draft, for reasons stated clearly > in previous threads about this spec. > > 1. The spec is technically incomplete, relying on other technologies > which have no expectation of being openly and freely specified I agree with Tab. I don't think W3C should be involved with a specifications which by design requires additional information shared between the relevant parties (and which can't be specified in an open standard). The specification is of no use outside the group of those parties, so there's no benefit to the health of the web in having it developed at the W3C. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 23:59:22 UTC