- From: Clarke Stevens <C.Stevens@CableLabs.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:17:53 +0000
- To: "Mays, David" <David_Mays@Comcast.com>, "john@netpurgatory.com" <john@netpurgatory.com>
- CC: "Kotay, Sree" <Sree_Kotay@cable.comcast.com>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>, Mathias Bynens <mathias@qiwi.be>, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
I think there are two critical points that we need to consider: 1. The proposed solution does not prevent content creators from distributing their content without protection if they choose to do so. Rejecting the specification would eliminate one collaboratively developed and common means for content creators to distribute their content while maintaining some additional control. 2. While rejecting the proposed solution might make a principled statement, it is unlikely (IMO) to lead to the desired outcome of content being distributed without restriction. It is much more likely to reinforce the current status of providing proprietary and non-interoperable solutions. Thanks, -Clarke Stevens CableLabs
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 22:18:33 UTC