- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 13:44:38 -0500
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, public-html-admin@w3.org
It now appears that my question wasn't needed, since WebApps already answered this same question early in the year while publishing Web Storage as a W3C Recommendation. As such, it was already asserted that section 5 of DOM Events is stable and the Director already agreed with the assertion by publishing Web Storage as a W3C Recommendation. At this time, I don't believe that a follow-up on this subject is needed. Philippe On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 07:51 -0500, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi Alex, Robin, All, > > I would appreciate it if you would please provide feedback on PLH's > question as soon as you can (today or tomorrow if possible). FYI, the > Draft Proposed Recommendation is > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/progress/raw-file/default/TR/Overview.html>. > > -Thanks, ArtB > > On 12/5/13 3:15 PM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > > The Web Applications Working Group is trying to move the Progress Event > > specification to Proposed Recommendation. During the transition call, it > > was noted that Progress Event relies on DOM Events, including the event > > init mechanism introduced in DOM4. > > > > The implementation report of Progress Event [1] establishes that there > > are 3 implementations of the event init mechanism already (two might > > originate from the same code however). > > > > Since most of section 5 of DOM Events finds its origin in the previous > > DOM specifications and there is some implementation of the event init > > mechanism, does the HTML Working Group believe that section 5 of the DOM > > specification is stable enough that changes to that section won't impact > > comformant implementations of Progress Event? A positive answer would > > allow the Progress Event specification to move forward. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Philippe > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ProgressEvents > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 9 December 2013 18:44:50 UTC