- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 07:51:55 -0500
- To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- CC: public-html-admin@w3.org
Hi Alex, Robin, All, I would appreciate it if you would please provide feedback on PLH's question as soon as you can (today or tomorrow if possible). FYI, the Draft Proposed Recommendation is <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/progress/raw-file/default/TR/Overview.html>. -Thanks, ArtB On 12/5/13 3:15 PM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > The Web Applications Working Group is trying to move the Progress Event > specification to Proposed Recommendation. During the transition call, it > was noted that Progress Event relies on DOM Events, including the event > init mechanism introduced in DOM4. > > The implementation report of Progress Event [1] establishes that there > are 3 implementations of the event init mechanism already (two might > originate from the same code however). > > Since most of section 5 of DOM Events finds its origin in the previous > DOM specifications and there is some implementation of the event init > mechanism, does the HTML Working Group believe that section 5 of the DOM > specification is stable enough that changes to that section won't impact > comformant implementations of Progress Event? A positive answer would > allow the Progress Event specification to move forward. > > Thank you, > > Philippe > > [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ProgressEvents > >
Received on Monday, 9 December 2013 14:21:12 UTC