- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:01:44 -0400
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "team-html-a11y@w3.org" <team-html-a11y@w3.org>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
Sam: Sam Ruby writes: > On 09/10/2013 07:36 PM, Janina Sajka wrote: > >Dear All: > > > >I'm very disappointed to note that longdesc is still listed in the > >obsolete (Sec. 11) of the HTML 5.1 nightly. Is this also the case with > >the current crop of heartbeats? > > > >Surely everyone is aware that the TF's longdesc extension Las Call > >expires Monday next? > > > >Can we please, please have this resolved immediately? As agreed? > > I encourage you to write a bug report. I'm confident that such will > be handled appropriately. > While the pointer may have been edited from the May 2013 email below, the below text does refer to the existing bug: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21341 Janina > As to what we agreed to previously, here is what plan 2014 states: > > If such a specification obtains consensus and meets the proposed CR > exit criteria by 2014Q2 it could be folded back into the core HTML > spec by that time. > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html > > >Janina > > - Sam Ruby > > >Janina Sajka writes: > >>Hi, Robin: > >> > >>Robin Berjon writes: > >>>Hi Janina, > >>> > >>>On 24/05/2013 18:12 , Janina Sajka wrote: > >>>>I will withdraw my objection at this time in the interest of preserving > >>>>and furthering the comity that has arisen among us since Plan 2014. > >>> > >>>Thank you. > >>> > >>Well, it's not my intent to throw a major monkey-wrench into the works. > >>Perhaps we should have inquired about prioritization and communicated > >>our expected timelines before. > >> > >>>>While I do not think anyone is intentionally delaying here, continued > >>>>delay does exaserbate W3C accessibility messaging. Also, we're now > >>>>quite likely to have a Last Call for HTMl Image Description published before > >>>>another HTML heartbeat is published. > >>> > >>>What is your time frame for LC? We're not really constrained as to > >>>the minimal amount of time between heartbeats. > >>> > >>We're expecting LC late June. We further expect to prepare our CR > >>implementation report during LC, so that we may well go to PR late > >>August/early September, skipping CR. > >> > >>>>Is there any reason it's unreasonable to expect this bug to be resolved > >>>>before the NEXT publication milestone? > >>> > >>>No, I wouldn't think so. As I said, it hasn't been handled either > >>>high or low priority. I (and as far as I know, the other editors > >>>too) tend to proceed by fixing blocks of bugs that are on related > >>>topics. We can certainly handle this bug soon. > >>> > >>Thanks, Robin. That would be helpful. > >> > >>Janina > >> > >>>-- > >>>Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > >> > >>-- > >> > >>Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > >> sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net > >> Email: janina@rednote.net > >> > >>Linux Foundation Fellow > >>Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > >> > >>The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > >>Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf > >> Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/ > >> > > -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Email: janina@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 04:02:19 UTC