On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 12/04/2013 10:32 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: > >> >> The decision was NOT that focus rings should be removed from the at-risk >> list. It was that they should stay as at-risk. >> > > This seems rather unlikely as it isn't permitted by the Charter: > > http://www.w3.org/2013/09/html-charter.html#decisions > > Specifically: > > The group must not record any final decisions without first > allowing for remote asynchronous participation in the decision > > What seems more likely to have occurred is that the collectively input of > the people who happened to be in the room at the time was to recommend that > focus rings stay as at-risk. That certainly is fair and reasonable, but > does not in any way remove the rights of members of the working group who > were not present to participate in the discussion. So no decision was made? What does this mean then: The Resolution is therefore: The HTML Accessibility Task Force requests that the HTML Working Group maintain the *FocusRing(element) methods in the Canvas 2d context specification, marking them "at risk". [1] or is a 'resolution' not a 'decision'? 1: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Dec/0006.html
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 04:01:45 UTC