- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:43:35 -0500
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- CC: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@chromium.org>
On 12/04/2013 10:32 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > The decision was NOT that focus rings should be removed from the at-risk > list. It was that they should stay as at-risk. This seems rather unlikely as it isn't permitted by the Charter: http://www.w3.org/2013/09/html-charter.html#decisions Specifically: The group must not record any final decisions without first allowing for remote asynchronous participation in the decision What seems more likely to have occurred is that the collectively input of the people who happened to be in the room at the time was to recommend that focus rings stay as at-risk. That certainly is fair and reasonable, but does not in any way remove the rights of members of the working group who were not present to participate in the discussion. - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 03:44:07 UTC