- From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:29:09 +0000
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- CC: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
Option 2 is better for me. -----Original Message----- From: public-html-a11y-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-a11y-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Silvia Pfeiffer Sent: 01 April 2011 04:18 To: Silvia Pfeiffer; HTML Accessibility Task Force Cc: Janina Sajka Subject: Re: Media Subteam Teleconference--Time of the Call If people don't object, let's move it. Thanks, Silvia. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > You say "almost," so I'm asking. Shall we move, or leave as is? I think > it's your call to make. > > Janina > > Silvia Pfeiffer writes: >> I'd almost prefer the second option, because then I will just take the >> call from home before going to work and can avoid booking rooms. >> 7:30am is good - earlier would conflict with getting kid to school routine. >> >> Thanks, >> Silvia. >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: >> > Media Subteam Colleagues: >> > >> > Please respond ... >> > >> > I took on the task of updating us on the implications of moving our call >> > back by 30 minutes vs leaving it as is. Here's what I've found. >> > >> > Much of the southern hemisphere (including Sydney) moves back to >> > standard time this coming weekend. >> > >> > 1.) Option: Do nothing and leave our meeting pegged to 22:00 UTC (as >> > it currently is). >> > >> > 3:00 PM San Francisco -- U.S. Pacific (Daylight) Time (UTC -7) >> > 6:00 PM Boston -- U.S. Eastern (Daylight) Time (UTC -4) >> > 11:00 PM London -- British (Summer) Time (UTC +1) >> > 08:00+1 Sydney -- Australian Eastern (Standard) Time (UTC +10) >> > >> > See all implications of leaving our meeting at 22:00 UTC via this URI: >> > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=4&day=6&year=2011&hour=22&min=0&sec=0&p1=0 >> > >> > My Analysis: This is our best option. Silvia, will it work? >> > >> > 2.) Option: Move our start time back by 30 minutes to 21:30 UTC. >> > >> > 2:30 PM San Francisco -- U.S. Pacific (Daylight) Time (UTC -7) >> > 5:30 PM Boston -- U.S. Eastern (Daylight) Time (UTC -4) >> > 10:30 PM London -- British (Summer) Time (UTC +1) >> > 07:30+1 Sydney -- Australian Eastern (Standard) Time (UTC +10) >> > >> > See all implications of moving our meeting to 21:30 UTC via this URI: >> > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=4&day=6&year=2011&hour=21&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 >> > >> > My Analysis: While attractive to those of us in the northern hemisphere, >> > I suspect this will not work for Silvia. >> > >> > Suggestion: Stay at 22:00 UTC >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 >> > sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net >> > >> > Chair, Open Accessibility janina@a11y.org >> > Linux Foundation http://a11y.org >> > >> > Chair, Protocols & Formats >> > Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf >> > World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) >> > >> > >> > > > -- > > Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net > > Chair, Open Accessibility janina@a11y.org > Linux Foundation http://a11y.org > > Chair, Protocols & Formats > Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf > World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > >
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 08:29:57 UTC