- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:13:54 -0700
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html-a11y@w3.org
On Jul 19, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 16:41 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: >>> + 2.6 Captioning >>> >>> Text content with the ability to contain hyperlinks, and semantic and >>> style >>> instructions. >>> >>> QUESTION: Are subtitles separate documents? Or are they combined with >>> captions >>> in a single document, in which case multiple documents may be present to >>> support subtitles and captions in various languages, e.g. EN, FR, DE, >>> JP, etc. >> >> Given that hyperlinks don't exist in any mainstream captioning software >> (that I know of), it can hardly be a requirement unless virtually all >> existing software is insufficient. > > But youtube, for example, does have annotations with hyperlinks in them. > They're not captions, but they're still timed text content that contain > hyperlinks. Do we need YouTube-style annotation to be a built-in feature of the <video> element? Or would it be sufficient to make the <video> element capable enough that YouTube or other sites could build similar features themselves out of the primitives provided Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 19 July 2010 18:14:34 UTC