W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > August 2010

[Bug 10455] Mint a describedby attribute for the img element

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:11:46 +0000
To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OpjXu-0001Ku-Kg@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10455


Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-i
                   |                            |ua.no




--- Comment #15 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>  2010-08-29 15:11:46 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)

> > We can reference an external resource as the long description with invisible
> > metadata:
> > 
> >    <img id="image"
> >         src="foo.jpg" 
> >         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
> >         alt="{Short alternative}"
> >         about="#image"
> >         rel="dc:description"
> >         resource="long-description.html">
> >
> 
> I have a question to the RDFa community about this, especially in light of
> previous discussions about XForms[1]. The @resource isn't intended to be
> clickable, but as Mark pointed out in the XForms discussion, user agents can go
> above and beyond the intended RDFa purpose. 

Also see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Aug/0098

]]
ISSUE-45 (cite and longdesc support): Consider supporting cite and longdesc
attributes in XHTML+RDFa and HTML+RDFa [RDFa 1.1 in XHTML 1.1]
[[

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 29 August 2010 15:11:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:13 UTC