- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:01:08 +0100
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: "janina@rednote.net" <janina@rednote.net>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
That is not true. We took time to consider your suggestions and discussed them individually before reaching any conclusions. Josh On 22 Apr 2010, at 19:42, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:19 PM, <janina@rednote.net> wrote: >>> From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> >>> >>> The Accessibility TF held a vote and did a blanket rejection of >>> several separate change proposals--all without discussion in the TF >>> group, and without splitting the items up so that each may be >>> considered by their own merit. >> >> >> As Co-Facilitator of the Task Force, I want to correct the record >> here. >> >> It is incorrect to say that we did not consider each individual >> change >> proposal. While our resolution aggregates our response, we did >> indeed consider >> each item separately--on its merits. >> >> Furthermore, our recommendation message documents our deliberations >> on each >> individual proposal by URI reference to our WBS survey and to the >> minutes of the meeting where we >> discussed each proposal individually: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/1086.html >> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/200404_ftf-proposals/results#xq5 >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Apr/ >> 0131.html >> >> For convenience our deliberations are minuted at: >> http://www.w3.org/2010/04/07-html-a11y-minutes.html >> >> My apology if this was too obscure in the chain of URIs. >> >> > > Janina, you didn't respond on each individual item. > > We shouldn't have to look through meeting minutes and emails in order > to find responses in regards to each element. These were separate > change proposals. Because they happened at the same time should not > have impacted on how the group responded to these _individual_ change > proposals. > > In particular, the group wasn't even interested in several of the > elements. From the discussion, the view on some seemed to be > indifferent, at best. That, to me, is not reflected in your > resolution. > > At a minimum, you could have posted about each of these items as a > separate poll item, and then allowed your group to voice their > interests over each, individually. > > Regardless, the only official response I see to this group on these > items is a single paragraph. That is the only item to which I can > respond. > > >> Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > > I also wish this discussion would happen in the HTML WG, because my > emails get blocked to the html-ally email group. > > Shelley >
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:01:26 UTC