- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:20:14 -0400
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: janina@rednote.net, public-html@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org
Shelley Powers writes: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:19 PM, <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > Janina, you didn't respond on each individual item. Yes, it was our group decision to aggregate our response for our own convenience. That is true. Whether or not that is appropriate is certainly arguable. Please understand, though, that we did consider each of your proposals individually. Some we ruled out of scope for the TF. Where we had a concern, we discussed each separately, as I and others have pointed out. Janina > > We shouldn't have to look through meeting minutes and emails in order > to find responses in regards to each element. These were separate > change proposals. Because they happened at the same time should not > have impacted on how the group responded to these _individual_ change > proposals. > > In particular, the group wasn't even interested in several of the > elements. From the discussion, the view on some seemed to be > indifferent, at best. That, to me, is not reflected in your > resolution. > > At a minimum, you could have posted about each of these items as a > separate poll item, and then allowed your group to voice their > interests over each, individually. > > Regardless, the only official response I see to this group on these > items is a single paragraph. That is the only item to which I can > respond. > > > > Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > > I also wish this discussion would happen in the HTML WG, because my > emails get blocked to the html-ally email group. > > Shelley -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Chair, Open Accessibility janina@a11y.org Linux Foundation http://a11y.org Chair, Protocols & Formats Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:20:47 UTC