public-houdini-archive@w3.org from October 2025 by thread

Re: [css-houdini-drafts] should paint() take <custom-ident> rather than <ident>? (#1077) Sebastian Zartner via GitHub (Thursday, 16 October)

Closed: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] is registerProperty <image> not implemented in Blink ? (#925) andruud via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)

Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] is registerProperty <image> not implemented in Blink ? (#925) Sebastian Zartner via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)

• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] is registerProperty <image> not implemented in Blink ? (#925) andruud via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] is registerProperty <image> not implemented in Blink ? (#925) Sebastian Zartner via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] is registerProperty <image> not implemented in Blink ? (#925) andruud via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)

[css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Sam Atkins via GitHub (Tuesday, 14 October)

• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Sebastian Zartner via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Jan Varga via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Jan Varga via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Sam Atkins via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Jan Varga via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Sam Atkins via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Sebastian Zartner via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Jan Varga via GitHub (Thursday, 16 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Sam Atkins via GitHub (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Jan Varga via GitHub (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Sebastian Zartner via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) Alan Stearns via GitHub (Monday, 27 October)

[css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Recursion in CSSUnparsedValue isn't handled in serialization algorithm (#1158) Sam Atkins via GitHub (Friday, 3 October)

[css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] `StylePropertyMap.set()` and `.append()` don't reject string `var()` references (#1157) Sam Atkins via GitHub (Friday, 3 October)

Last message date: Monday, 27 October 2025 20:30:14 UTC