public-houdini-archive@w3.org from October 2025 by author

Alan Stearns via GitHub

• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Monday, 27 October)

andruud via GitHub

• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] is registerProperty <image> not implemented in Blink ? (#925) (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] is registerProperty <image> not implemented in Blink ? (#925) (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Closed: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] is registerProperty <image> not implemented in Blink ? (#925) (Wednesday, 15 October)

Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub

• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Wednesday, 15 October)

Jan Varga via GitHub

• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Thursday, 16 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Wednesday, 15 October)

Sam Atkins via GitHub

• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Wednesday, 15 October)
• [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Tuesday, 14 October)
• [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Recursion in CSSUnparsedValue isn't handled in serialization algorithm (#1158) (Friday, 3 October)
• [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] `StylePropertyMap.set()` and `.append()` don't reject string `var()` references (#1157) (Friday, 3 October)

Sebastian Zartner via GitHub

• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Tuesday, 21 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] should paint() take <custom-ident> rather than <ident>? (#1077) (Thursday, 16 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] is registerProperty <image> not implemented in Blink ? (#925) (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] is registerProperty <image> not implemented in Blink ? (#925) (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om] Can we avoid property-specific reification rules for most cases? (#1159) (Wednesday, 15 October)

Last message date: Monday, 27 October 2025 20:30:14 UTC