I suggest we move the current Clear Key tests into the main folder only after we determine whether they will be modified for multi-drm or duplicated/modified. Mark: Are you proposing the latter?
Is there any benefit of separating Clear Key and Multi-DRM into subfolders as well? We can modify names to address this, which I think might be preferred.
Jerry
From: Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 9:35 AM
To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> (ddorwin@google.com) <ddorwin@google.com>; Matthew Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> (wolenetz@google.com) <wolenetz@google.com>; Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org) <plh@w3.org>; Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>; public-hme-editors@w3.org; Iraj Sodagar <irajs@microsoft.com>; John Simmons <johnsim@microsoft.com>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Sukhmal Kommidi <skommidi@netflix.com>; Greg Rutz <G.Rutz@cablelabs.com>
Subject: Re: DRM Today-based test case for EME
Question: should we expand this test case to cover ClearKey ? Or will we rely on the tests in the Google folder for ClearKey ?
If the latter, should we move those tests into the main directory (I see they are now working) ? Or, if others would like to add ClearKey tests, should they add them to the Google folder ?
...Mark
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>> wrote:
All,
Sukhmal has created a Pull Request for a temporary session test case using DRM Today. We have tested this on Chrome with Widevine and it should work on Edge with PlayReady as well:
https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/3313
Please review this and comment on whether it is a good template / model for us to work from. We can quickly migrate more of the Google clearkey tests to drmtoday as well as implementing tests for other session types based on this model.
...Mark