Re: DRM Today-based test case for EME from Mark Watson on 2016-07-20 (public-hme-editors@w3.org from July 2016)

From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:34:46 -0700
To: "David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> (ddorwin@google.com)" <ddorwin@google.com>, "Matthew Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> (wolenetz@google.com)" <wolenetz@google.com>, "Jerry Smith (WPT)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org)" <plh@w3.org>, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, "public-hme-editors@w3.org" <public-hme-editors@w3.org>, Iraj Sodagar <irajs@microsoft.com>, John Simmons <johnsim@microsoft.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Sukhmal Kommidi <skommidi@netflix.com>, Greg Rutz <G.Rutz@cablelabs.com>
Message-ID: <CAEnTvdCnsf=g5yayrJfgpZTb5-HeYJRRpOq67rUhP40gOmTV7w@mail.gmail.com>

Question: should we expand this test case to cover ClearKey ? Or will we
rely on the tests in the Google folder for ClearKey ?

If the latter, should we move those tests into the main directory (I see
they are now working) ? Or, if others would like to add ClearKey tests,
should they add them to the Google folder ?

...Mark

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> Sukhmal has created a Pull Request for a temporary session test case using
> DRM Today. We have tested this on Chrome with Widevine and it should work
> on Edge with PlayReady as well:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/3313
>
> Please review this and comment on whether it is a good template / model
> for us to work from. We can quickly migrate more of the Google clearkey
> tests to drmtoday as well as implementing tests for other session types
> based on this model.
>
> ...Mark
>

Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 16:35:17 UTC