I have now also posted PR#146 to fix #104, which might be substantive (though I don't think so). Paul, please advise on that one, too. On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> wrote: > While we're iterating on MSE #99, I've updated MSE #124: it might be > substantive. Paul, please advise. > > I'll take a look at MSE #104 next, then work on the test PRs and test > issues. > > Paul, so that we can all be on the same page, what does the current MSE > (and EME) timeline look like, since we've obviously not met the August 2 > transition to PR deadline? > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Matt: Since we have seen no movement on the HTML 5.1 issue that is >>>> blocking MSE ISSUE-99, do we have a work around we can use WITHOUT any HTML >>>> 5.1 change? >>>> >>>> https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/99 >>>> >>>> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/550 >>>> >>> I'll craft an MSE fix for #99 and try to land it tomorrow. It will >>> follow the path laid out in #99 comments, so though I'm less comfortable >>> lacking review from Jerry and Mark for it before landing it, I'm somewhat >>> confident it will stick. >>> >> >> Paul (and/or Philippe), since Mark and Jerry are OoO (and I think >> Francois is, too), could you please take a look at my PR to fix #99 >> (details: https://github.com/w3c/media-source/pull/143#issue >> comment-238727976 ) and let me know if you see any concerns? >> > >
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2016 21:55:29 UTC