Re: Preparation of MSE Proposed Recommendation

While we're iterating on MSE #99, I've updated MSE #124: it might be
substantive. Paul, please advise.

I'll take a look at MSE #104 next, then work on the test PRs and test
issues.

Paul, so that we can all be on the same page, what does the current MSE
(and EME) timeline look like, since we've obviously not met the August 2
transition to PR deadline?

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Matt: Since we have seen no movement on the HTML 5.1 issue that is
>>> blocking MSE ISSUE-99, do we have a work around we can use WITHOUT any HTML
>>> 5.1 change?
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/99
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/550
>>>
>> I'll craft an MSE fix for #99 and try to land it tomorrow. It will follow
>> the path laid out in #99 comments, so though I'm less comfortable lacking
>> review from Jerry and Mark for it before landing it, I'm somewhat confident
>> it will stick.
>>
>
> Paul (and/or Philippe), since Mark and Jerry are OoO (and I think Francois
> is, too), could you please take a look at my PR to fix #99 (details:
> https://github.com/w3c/media-source/pull/143#issuecomment-238727976 ) and
> let me know if you see any concerns?
>

Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 22:09:42 UTC