- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:07:07 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > I am currently getting a failure on the loopx test, which the same code > used to pass. > > My analysis is as follows: > > Source URL: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/loopx > > may map to > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/loopx.xml > > or to > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/loopx.xsl eek; indeed, it's unfortunate that the loopx.xsl was given the same basename. > both being of mimetype application/xml there is no valid content > negotiation to choose the former. > > The test works if the former is chosen. > > If the latter is chosen the test fails. > > Even fi the former is chosen, there is potentially one or more > dereference of the same URL when using the GRDDL algorithm, which may > give the other result. > > I suggest modifying the htaccess file to force > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/loopx > > to map to > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/loopx.xml Hmm... I guess that's OK by me. I wonder if renaming loopx.xsl is more or less costly. > I would value anyone else experience of trying to run the loopx test > > Jeremy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 15:06:48 UTC