- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:34:49 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > Hmm... I guess that's OK by me. > > I wonder if renaming loopx.xsl is more or less costly. > > It's referenced by loopx.xml, which is presumably copied in a number of places. The redirect is probably the cheaper option Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 15:35:15 UTC