Re: GRDDL Test Documents - moving all the tests, including approved tests?

On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 14:32 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> It was hard for me to meet the goal of putting together a cohrent 
> (and minimally functional) draft for a quick WD cycle *before* the upcoming teleconference (as was decided on 
> wednesday) without making certain assumptions about the final URL, what to do about broken tests, the value 
> of putting all tests in the archive or just the local ones, and a delivery 
> mechanism, so I did the best I could with the minimal amount of 
> changes to the material in testlist*.html

Ah. I see.

> If this is not satisfactory, some *concrete* suggestions of a delivery 
> mechanism that minimizes synchronization would be greatly 
> appreciated.

Jeremy suggested "leaving
as *the* repository, and including a zip of whatever you want to archive
in "

I think that works for me; I suppose the 3 of us should get
together synchronously to discuss alternatives and pick something.
(If you two want to pick something without me, that's fine too.)

>   If simply going with grddl-wg/td/* as the all-in-one 
> directory and have a webmaster (or whoever will need to do the 
> neccessary due dilligence ) deal with the rest is okay, then 
> grddl-wg/doc50 can be disregarded.

I think that will work; I think a "make TR" or "make release"
target will probably be worthwhile.

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 19:02:20 UTC