RE: GRDDL spec doesn't handle <link rel="transformation and something else">

On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 12:15 -0500, Clark, John wrote:
> > The subject of this message is a test sketch.
> > I hope to flesh it out into a real test and find out what 
> > current implementations do with it. Bonus points to anybody 
> > who beats me to it.
> Oh, I want bonus points!  I should have attached a small patch to
> `testlist1.html` adding a test that I believe covers this case (based on
> the #rdfa1 test) to this email as well as the new file
> `rdf_sem-inline.html` that is the actual input to this test case.
> Please confirm that this accurately exercises this case.

OK, you get 10 bonus points for the attempt,
and 10 for reporting that doesn't pass the test.
I'm holding 80 points in reserve for when the WG approves the
test. I offer
 10 points for sombody (Harry? Brian M?) to check it in to CVS
 10 points for JJC to try it on his code

I have an ssh key from Chime, so I should be able to get him
CVS commit access when I find a spare moment.

I need to update the informal/mechanical rules and test them.
(unless, by some miracle, somebody else groks them well
enough to do that.)

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 17:33:23 UTC