Summary of ambiguity proposals

There are 3 different proposals:

PROPOSAL 1c changes the domain of a transformation from an XPath node
tree to the original XML document representation.
Normative changes:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0331.html
Informative changes:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0360.html


PROPOSAL 2d extends 1c to use non-validating parsing in determining what
transformations to apply.  This proposal most fully addresses the
ambiguity issue.
Normative changes:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0355.html
Informative changes:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0359.html


PROPOSAL 3c (compromise) makes only informative changes to clearly
indicate that GRDDL implementations are expected to conform to the W3C
TAG issue xmlFunctions-34 resolution and the XProc definition of a
default processing model if issued.  Changes:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0333.html


David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office  |  dbooth@hp.com
http://www.hp.com/go/software

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent
the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 06:22:42 UTC