- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:01:56 -0400
- To: <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
For proposal 2d, here are suggested changes to the informative text
(subject to the editor's discretion) to stay in sync with the
proposed normative changes. Diffs are WRT version 1.275.
----
In section 2
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec.html#grddl-xml
1.
540,541c539,540
< <p>The <tt>glean_title.xsl</tt> resource specifies a function from
< XPath document nodes to RDF/XML documents, and hence to RDF graphs;
---
> <p>The <tt>glean_title.xsl</tt> resource specifies a function from XML
> document representations to RDF/XML documents, and hence to RDF
graphs;
2. Update the informative n3 mechanical rules as the editor sees fit.
3.
582a588,595
> <p>For the purpose of determining what transformations should be
> applied, GRDDL uses the XPath node tree that would be obtained from
the
> XML document using only the processing required of a non-validating
> processor<a href="spec-2d.html#XML">[XML]</a>(section 5.1).
Thus,
> the determination of what transformations should be applied does not
> depend on the resolution of external DTDs, external entities or
> external schemas. <br>
> </p>
In section 6
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec.html#txforms
4.
1048c1061,1062
< <b>transformation property</b>, a function from XPath document nodes
---
> <b>transformation property</b>, a function from XML document
> representations
5.
1051c1065
< nodes. For example, use of <tt>xsl:message</tt> with
---
> representations. For example, use of <tt>xsl:message</tt> with
6.
1124,1126c1138,1142
< <p>When an information resource is represented by an XML document, the
< corresponding XPath data model may not be fully determined, depending
< on, for example, whether an agent elaborates inclusions, parameter
---
> <p>When an information resource is represented by an XML document, and
> a transformation converts it to an XPath or other data model before
> operating on it, that data model may not be fully determined,
depending
> on, for example, whether the transformation elaborates inclusions,
> parameter
7.
1134,1139c1150,1152
< <p>This specification is silent on the question of which XML
< processors are employed by or for GRDDL-aware agents. Whether or not
< processing of XInclude, XML Validity, XML Schema Validity, XML
< Signatures or XML Decryption take place is
< unspecified. There is no universal expectation that an XSLT
< processor will call on such processing before executing a GRDDL
---
> <p>There is no universal expectation that an XSLT version 1.0
> processor[<a href="#XSLT1">XSLT1</a>] will call on such processing
> before executing a GRDDL
8.
1145c1158,1162
< reference XInclude, DTDs, XML Schemas and so on.</p>
---
> reference XInclude, DTDs, XML Schemas and so on. Alternatively,
a
> transformation author wishing to have complete control over such
> processing may write the transformation in a language other than XSLT
> version 1.0 that offers complete control of the
pre-processing.<br>
> </p>
9.
1148c1165,1166
< who wish their documents to be unambiguous when used with GRDDL should
---
> who wish their documents to be unambiguous when used with GRDDL and
> XSLT version 1.0 should
In section 10 (Normative References)
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec.html#normativeRefs
10.
1574a1593,1603
> <dt id="XML"><dt id="XML"><a name="XML"></a>XML</dt>
> </dt>
> <dd> <cite><a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816">Extensible
> Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition)</a></cite>, T Bray, J.
> Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, E. Maler, F. Yergeau,
> Editors, W3C Recommendation, 16 August 2006,
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816 . <a
> href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xml"
> title="Latest version of XML Path
> Language (XPath) Version 1.0">Latest
> version</a> available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml .</dd>
David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com
http://www.hp.com/go/software
Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent
the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 06:12:15 UTC