- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:01:56 -0400
- To: <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
For proposal 2d, here are suggested changes to the informative text (subject to the editor's discretion) to stay in sync with the proposed normative changes. Diffs are WRT version 1.275. ---- In section 2 http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec.html#grddl-xml 1. 540,541c539,540 < <p>The <tt>glean_title.xsl</tt> resource specifies a function from < XPath document nodes to RDF/XML documents, and hence to RDF graphs; --- > <p>The <tt>glean_title.xsl</tt> resource specifies a function from XML > document representations to RDF/XML documents, and hence to RDF graphs; 2. Update the informative n3 mechanical rules as the editor sees fit. 3. 582a588,595 > <p>For the purpose of determining what transformations should be > applied, GRDDL uses the XPath node tree that would be obtained from the > XML document using only the processing required of a non-validating > processor<a href="spec-2d.html#XML">[XML]</a>(section 5.1). Thus, > the determination of what transformations should be applied does not > depend on the resolution of external DTDs, external entities or > external schemas. <br> > </p> In section 6 http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec.html#txforms 4. 1048c1061,1062 < <b>transformation property</b>, a function from XPath document nodes --- > <b>transformation property</b>, a function from XML document > representations 5. 1051c1065 < nodes. For example, use of <tt>xsl:message</tt> with --- > representations. For example, use of <tt>xsl:message</tt> with 6. 1124,1126c1138,1142 < <p>When an information resource is represented by an XML document, the < corresponding XPath data model may not be fully determined, depending < on, for example, whether an agent elaborates inclusions, parameter --- > <p>When an information resource is represented by an XML document, and > a transformation converts it to an XPath or other data model before > operating on it, that data model may not be fully determined, depending > on, for example, whether the transformation elaborates inclusions, > parameter 7. 1134,1139c1150,1152 < <p>This specification is silent on the question of which XML < processors are employed by or for GRDDL-aware agents. Whether or not < processing of XInclude, XML Validity, XML Schema Validity, XML < Signatures or XML Decryption take place is < unspecified. There is no universal expectation that an XSLT < processor will call on such processing before executing a GRDDL --- > <p>There is no universal expectation that an XSLT version 1.0 > processor[<a href="#XSLT1">XSLT1</a>] will call on such processing > before executing a GRDDL 8. 1145c1158,1162 < reference XInclude, DTDs, XML Schemas and so on.</p> --- > reference XInclude, DTDs, XML Schemas and so on. Alternatively, a > transformation author wishing to have complete control over such > processing may write the transformation in a language other than XSLT > version 1.0 that offers complete control of the pre-processing.<br> > </p> 9. 1148c1165,1166 < who wish their documents to be unambiguous when used with GRDDL should --- > who wish their documents to be unambiguous when used with GRDDL and > XSLT version 1.0 should In section 10 (Normative References) http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec.html#normativeRefs 10. 1574a1593,1603 > <dt id="XML"><dt id="XML"><a name="XML"></a>XML</dt> > </dt> > <dd> <cite><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816">Extensible > Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition)</a></cite>, T Bray, J. > Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, E. Maler, F. Yergeau, > Editors, W3C Recommendation, 16 August 2006, > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816 . <a > href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xml" > title="Latest version of XML Path > Language (XPath) Version 1.0">Latest > version</a> available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml .</dd> David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 06:12:15 UTC