- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 01:56:38 -0400
- To: <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
This supercedes proposal 1b. It is the same except that parts related to defining the notion of "complete GRDDL results" have been eliminated. This proposal changes the input of a GRDDL transformation from an XPath node tree to the original XML document representation, so that transformations can control the parsing if desired. PROPOSAL #1c: In the following existing normative text: http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#rule_result [[ If an information resource([WEBARCH], section 2.2) IR is represented by an XML document with an XPath root node R, and R has a GRDDL transformation with a transformation property TP, and TP applied to R gives an RDF Graph[RDFC04] G, then G is a GRDDL result of IR. ]] change "XML document" to "XML document D" and "TP applied to R" to "TP applied to D". And make corresponding changes to the informative text in section 6 and elsewhere as needed. ANALYSIS: - This change does not require any changes to the test cases. - This is only a partial solution to the ambiguity problem, because there would still be ambiguity in the determination of what GRDDL transformations to apply. (Proposal 2c further addresses that ambiguity.) David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 05:58:24 UTC