RE: procedural point about PR vote

My apologies - this was not intended to go the GRDDL list - trouble with
doing email at 4am :(   Please ignore.

Brian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of McBride, Brian
> Sent: 23 June 2007 05:00
> To: Jeremy Carroll; GRDDL Working Group
> Subject: RE: procedural point about PR vote
> 
> 
> > So, in my view, deciding to address DBooth3 along the lines 
> that David 
> > has suggested, would mean that the last item could not be 
> considered 
> > at this meeting. I guess there won't be a meeting on July 4.
> 
> I was working that out on the plane.  I don't think there can 
> be a PR vote on Wed unless we say that David doesn't even get 
> his editorial changes - unless enough of them are in.
> 
> :(
> 
> Brian
> 
>

Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 12:30:28 UTC