- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:02:48 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 09:06 +0200, Ivan Herman wrote: > Hm. I am obviously a bit worried about this, for reasons you cite below. > This may easily degenerate into a religious debate on microformats vs > RDF, XML vs. non-XML, and world peace in general...:-( > > Thinking about it... isn't it correct that all the issues that might be > commented and discussed are typical last call issues? With GRDDL heading > for PR at the moment, it strikes me as being too late. > Interested/worried parties had their possibilities to comment... I'm not sure The Director should support a request for PR without discharging a dependency on HTML. > Besides: GRDDL is diligently following the designs and technical > decision of existing recommendations. Possibly being under the pressure > for radically changing the GRDDL design on request from a group that did > not even exist when the GRDDL WG started is, well, possibly inappropriate... True, the dependency didn't exist when the group started. But it (arguably) does now. > Ie, my current feeling is that we can move on without this. > > DanC, thanks for having raised the issue... > > Ivan -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 14:02:57 UTC