- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:28:35 +0100
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Fortunately doc29 is a sufficiently funky choice of directory name that any occurrence of that string is likely to be an error! Jeremy Harry Halpin wrote: > > Dan Connolly wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 10:00 -0400, Harry Halpin wrote: >> >>> I will simply grep all the editor draft's "doc29" URIs in the primer >>> directory and replace them with absolute URIs to the Note "TR" directory >>> once we know the final URI of the primer. I believe this is standard >>> practice before publication. >>> >> Hmm... that sort of practice is error prone. I recommend >> relative linking. >> > Agreed in general, but then the cut-and-paste doesn't work. Following > John's example and following jjc's earlier advice, I removed all > relative URIs from the example. More importantly, there's quite a few > places in the primer (i.e. SPARQL queries) where we can't use relative > URIs, so I think we should have one convention and stick with it. I'm > leaning towards absolute URIs, which would require one last sanity > check work-through of all examples once it's in the /TR/ directory, but > I think that would be possible. >> >>> So, yes, use absolute "doc29" URIs and I'll >>> make sure to replace them before we push it out as a Note. >>> >> > > -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:29:00 UTC