- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:09:22 -0500
- To: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 09:53 -0400, Clark, John wrote: [...] > > Obviously the neatest version would use the correct dated URL > > to the final WG Note directory. I doubt this is achievable, > > and URLs to the editors' draft directory would do, or maybe > > relative URLs if the copy/paste functionality feels inappropriate. > > When the primer is actually published as a Note, will all its resources > be copied as well? Yes; all the images and data files and such will be archived in /TR/ . > If not, then I can definitely see why using URIs > instead of relative references would be strongly preferred. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:09:26 UTC