- From: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:53:27 +0200
- To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Dan Connolly: > I'd appreciate pointers from stuff like > "the schema document should (and likely will)..." to > relevant issues. Dan, I reviewed the "use cases" document and the "syntax" document" of RDFa. Use cases: Working Draft 30 March 2007 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xhtml-rdfa-scenarios-20070330/ Review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Apr/0047.html In the use cases doc, GRDDL is mentioned in the section on "Comparison to Microformats" http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xhtml-rdfa-scenarios-20070330/#id68510 Extract: "In such cases, microformats (possibly combined with GRDDL) provide a perfectly appropriate solution. However, in each of the use cases in this document, the microformat approach requires either building a new, complete vocabulary, or mixing several vocabularies in one single application. While this may be simple in the case of the basic existing microformats, it becomes prohibitive when large vocabularies are used (...)" Syntax: Editors' Draft v 1.8 2007/04/06 16:36:34 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/ Review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Apr/0057.html Here, all I can say is I didn't see any mention of GRDDL in the syntax and, although I did not make a thorough review of the primer, I didn't find a mention of GRDDL there either. Primer: Working Draft 12 March 2007. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xhtml-rdfa-primer-20070312/ I intend to catch up with the RDFa group to update the transformation, propose a profile and update the RDFa+GRDDL primer I once drafted and which is clearly out of date: http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/rdfaprimer/PrimerRDFaSection.html Cheers, -- Fabien - http://www.inria.fr/acacia/fabien/
Received on Friday, 13 April 2007 08:53:51 UTC