- From: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:48:33 +0100
- To: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
- CC: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On 29/09/2006 16:27, Fabien Gandon wrote: > I also find it too restrictive and I would rather have a title that > reflects what we want the primer to be rather than what the current > draft contains. I think that if we published a document called, for example, "How to glean RDF data from Microformats, Xforms and other XML documents" then readers will be confused when they find we don't cover those other formats in the document. Especially if they've just searched the web for a reference on RDF and XForms. My view is that the title ought to reflect the content and that it's easy enough to keep it in sync when we add more content. Ian
Received on Friday, 29 September 2006 15:48:41 UTC