W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > November 2006

RE: Rules bug? format negotiation and GRDDL

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:49:35 -0600
To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1164127775.3997.438.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 08:26 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 10:22 +0000, McBride, Brian wrote:
> > Did you spot that I applied the transform referenced in the xhtml to the
> > svg document?
> No, I was reading too fast. (I hesitated to give an opinion at
> all without working thru the details in a test case... oh well.)

This isn't just a theoretical issue; the issue with the rules
that Brian found is matched by an issue with the online GRDDL
service (see problem report and diagnosis below).

Ian, have you made any progress on your action?
  ACTION: Iand to construct a content negotiation test case

The agenda has that action under #issue-mt-ns, but
I wonder if a separate issue would be better.

On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 17:17 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: 
> Le mardi 21 novembre 2006 à 10:04 -0600, Dan Connolly a écrit :
> > Coralie noticed that the "RDF data you get via the GRDDL service"
> > link from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda
> > doesn't work.
> That's because that URI serves both HTML and RDF data, and apparently
> with a preference for RDF; the GRDDL service doesn't seem to like
> getting RDF directly, but it works fine with the HTML version:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xslfile=http%3A%2F%
> 2Fwww.w3.org%2F2003%2F11%2Frdf-in-xhtml-processor&xmlfile=http%3A%2F%
> 2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2Fsw%2Fgrddl-wg%2Fweekly-agenda.html
> Dom

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2006 16:49:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:34 UTC