- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:59:42 -0600
- To: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 22:27 +0000, Ian Davis wrote: > I've reviewed the first testcase[1] and in my view to make this test > case as clear and unambiguous as possible we need to do one of two things: > > (a) change the html document and stylesheets so that the triples > produced make no reference to the URI of the html document. This could > be achieved by using markup like: > > <div><a href="http://example.org/books#stand">The Stand</a> by <a > href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_King" rel="page" > >Stephen King</a></div> > > resulting in triples like: > > _:g1 rdf:type foaf:Person . > _:g1 foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_King> . > <http://example.org/books#stand> foaf:maker _:g1 . > <http://example.org/books#stand> dc:title "The Stand" . I don't understand how that helps. Why is an example.org URI better than one from the test suite? And why introduce #stand? Why not a hashless URI? A book is clearly an information resource. What ambiguity do you see? i.e. what is it that has two readings, and what are they? > or (b) resolve issue-base-param and modify the stylesheets used in the > test case to expect the specified base parameter and output this in the > resulting RDF/XML. How would that help? Any outcome of issue-base-param that I can imagine is consistent with the materials as they are. > At this stage I lean towards (a) and I'm willing to make the necessary > modifications. Before I do I'd like to hear some other opinions. > > > Ian > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1.html#title_author -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 16 November 2006 04:00:29 UTC