- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:27:54 +0100
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
I did send out the correct time, once in EST format, via e-mail [1], and it's listed as 15:00z on the agenda, which is correct, yet I didn't even check the local time link on the agenda [3]. So humblest apologies Chime - I've fixed the link and so it should be fixed for future meeting, and thanks for noticing that, just wish we could have had you at the meeting. Chime - sorry for missing you! We've just tabled your use-case discussion items to the meeting next week, although there was some interest that your XML Clinical Data Use-case be included as part of a 2-part primer (the other part being either the HTML-based scheduling or guitar?-buying use-case). If you are interested in this possibility, definitely e-mail back. In essence, it would require working on the example of extracting RDF from a few clinical data XML files and then querying them via SPARQL, and seeing if this could be written up with some running code and a readable step-by-step tutorial. The resolution made today was to do a re-occurring meeting at 11:00 EST/15:00Z on Wed. I'll send that out in an e-mail to the list ASAP. [1]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Aug/0062 [2]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Aug/0089.html [3]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda.html cheers, harry Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > > FYI: The link to local times for the agenda (currently) at > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda.html says 3:30pm EST > - which is when I was expecting the meeting to happen - hence my not > being there today. > > I didn't see a resolution about reoccuring meeting times in the > current minutes, so can someone please confirm what the concensus is? > > Chimezie Ogbuji > Lead Systems Analyst > Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery > Cleveland Clinic Foundation > 9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26 > Cleveland, Ohio 44195 > Office: (216)444-8593 > ogbujic@ccf.org > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Dan Connolly wrote: > >> >> On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 17:39 +0100, Ian Davis wrote: >>> Minutes are at: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-grddl-wg-minutes.html >>> >>> Note any fixes, replying to this message (be sure to CC >>> public-grddl-wg@w3.org) >> >> Thanks for getting these out right away... but... >> I'd like scribes to do a little bit of editing on the >> minutes between when the machine produces them and >> when you send mail to the WG. >> >> The reason I suggest attaching the HTML is >> that the rest of you aren't authorized to edit >> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-grddl-wg-minutes.html >> >> At a minimum, take off the - DRAFT - and remove >> the diagnostics at the bottom. But better to actually >> read them over to make sure they make sense, and >> correct anything that's obviously wrong. >> >> If it turns out that the raw minutes produced >> by machine are sufficient for our purposes, then >> maybe we should accept these minutes as is. But >> my experience is that it's worth taking 10 or 20 >> minutes to clean them up a bit. >> >> I haven't looked at this week's record closely yet. >> Maybe it's good enough as is. >> >> >> -- >> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ >> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E >> >> > -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 17:28:00 UTC