- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:59:44 -0400 (EDT)
- To: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
FYI: The link to local times for the agenda (currently) at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda.html says 3:30pm EST - which is when I was expecting the meeting to happen - hence my not being there today. I didn't see a resolution about reoccuring meeting times in the current minutes, so can someone please confirm what the concensus is? Chimezie Ogbuji Lead Systems Analyst Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation 9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26 Cleveland, Ohio 44195 Office: (216)444-8593 ogbujic@ccf.org On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 17:39 +0100, Ian Davis wrote: >> Minutes are at: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-grddl-wg-minutes.html >> >> Note any fixes, replying to this message (be sure to CC >> public-grddl-wg@w3.org) > > Thanks for getting these out right away... but... > I'd like scribes to do a little bit of editing on the > minutes between when the machine produces them and > when you send mail to the WG. > > The reason I suggest attaching the HTML is > that the rest of you aren't authorized to edit > http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-grddl-wg-minutes.html > > At a minimum, take off the - DRAFT - and remove > the diagnostics at the bottom. But better to actually > read them over to make sure they make sense, and > correct anything that's obviously wrong. > > If it turns out that the raw minutes produced > by machine are sufficient for our purposes, then > maybe we should accept these minutes as is. But > my experience is that it's worth taking 10 or 20 > minutes to clean them up a bit. > > I haven't looked at this week's record closely yet. > Maybe it's good enough as is. > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 16:59:55 UTC