Re: Minutes for review: Aug 23 2006 15:00Z GRDDL WG meeting

On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 17:39 +0100, Ian Davis wrote:
> Minutes are at:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-grddl-wg-minutes.html
> 
> Note any fixes, replying to this message (be sure to CC 
> public-grddl-wg@w3.org)

Thanks for getting these out right away... but...
I'd like scribes to do a little bit of editing on the
minutes between when the machine produces them and
when you send mail to the WG.

The reason I suggest attaching the HTML is
that the rest of you aren't authorized to edit
http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-grddl-wg-minutes.html

At a minimum, take off the - DRAFT - and remove
the diagnostics at the bottom. But better to actually
read them over to make sure they make sense, and
correct anything that's obviously wrong.

If it turns out that the raw minutes produced
by machine are sufficient for our purposes, then
maybe we should accept these minutes as is. But
my experience is that it's worth taking 10 or 20
minutes to clean them up a bit.

I haven't looked at this week's record closely yet.
Maybe it's good enough as is.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 16:52:08 UTC