- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:07:26 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, dave@dajobe.org
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 13:06 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Dear Dave > > this message is to update you as to the WG response to > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0003 > > Our current understanding is that: > - you are satisfied with the way we have addressed the whitespace comment. > - there is on-going discussion concerning the namespace document, the WG > response to your message is: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0019 > copied from > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/0218 > - and the other comments in your message are editorial in nature. > > The editor accepted the action: > http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action06 > ACTION: DanC to address editorial comments by Beckett in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0003 > > If you are already satisfied with this action as a response to the > aspects of your message other than whitespace or the namespace document, > please respond to indicate. > > If you would prefer to wait to see how the editor addresses your > comments, that would be very understandable, and we will update you when > the changes are made. See http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec 1.257 Revision 1.257 2007/04/26 23:03:29 connolly - in response to Beckett 4 Apr: -- noted in SOTD that normative assertions are marked up distinctively, to clarify that the long example is informative. Marked "Styling versus..." appendix as informative -- rephrased confusing sentence about associating a GRDDL transformation with a whole dialect -- fixed spelling of Vocabulary > thank you > > Jeremy Carroll > > > PS I am acting without explicit WG approval, to fulfil: > http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action08 > ACTION: JJC to see that the CR request gets to The Director > hence, there is the possibility of formal correction to this response > from the WG. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 23:07:56 UTC