- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:44 -0700
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- CC: public-grddl-comments@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Hi Dave > > you're right something did change. > I added xml:base and xml:lang support to embeddedRDF > http://www.w3.org/2003/g/embeddedRDF > For the xml:base support I was using an XSLT 2.0 function, with forward > compatible processing code for XSLT 1.0. > Since you reported difficulty with this, the WG consensus, at our > meeting today, was to not use the XSLT 2.0 function, but have the XSLT > 1.0 processing only. > > As a side effect > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/embedded-rdf7 > > cannot be processed by this transform, and the WG decided not to approve > either of the related tests. > > In summary, we have taken your comment as a comment against the library > rather than the test cases, and, we hope addressed it. > > Please confirm that this is satisfactory. Yes is is. Thanks Dave
Received on Friday, 27 April 2007 03:04:29 UTC