Re: GraphQL-RDF implementation, schema generation and common ground

"Having a call might be a good first step to initiate this effort?"

Sounds, good. How does one usually organise, such a call?
Sorry, I am a W3C group noob.

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:43 AM Ruben Taelman <ruben.taelman@ugent.be>
wrote:

> Hi Hem,
>
> > Does the group have an up to date list of GraphQL-RDF solutions,
> libraries, services etc? If not where can we start collating this
> information?
>
> We have a W3C GitHub repo where we are collecting things:
> https://github.com/w3c/graphql-rdf/blob/master/docs/resources.md
>
> Feel free to send a PR if anything is missing from that list.
>
> > It would be good to start some analysis across the various GraphQL-RDF
> schema generation approaches to find common ground and divergence.
>
> +1
> Having a call might be a good first step to initiate this effort?
>
>
> As mentioned on Twitter, I don’t have sufficient bandwidth at the moment
> to pull this effort on my own.
> I’m however happy to help anyone who would have more time to pull this.
>
> Kind regards,
> Ruben Taelman
>
> > On 16 Sep 2020, at 11:26, Jem Rayfield <jem.rayfield@ontotext.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does the group have an up to date list of GraphQL-RDF solutions,
> libraries, services etc? If not where can we start collating this
> information?
> >
> > Also, could we perhaps get Rubens paper updated?
> >
> > It would be good to start some analysis across the various GraphQL-RDF
> schema generation approaches to find common ground and divergence.
> >
> > Let me know how I can help, with the effort
> >
> > Cheers
> > --
> > Jem Rayfield
> > Chief Architect
> > Ontotext AD
>
>

-- 
Jem Rayfield
Chief Architect
Ontotext AD