- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 06:14:00 +0000
- To: Julie Rawe <jrawe@understood.org>
- Cc: Jennifer Strickland <jstrickland@mitre.org>, Jan McSorley <mcsorleyjan@gmail.com>, "public-global-inclusion@w3.org" <public-global-inclusion@w3.org>, Jean Strohmier <jean.strohmier@gmail.com>, Katy Brickley <katy.brickley@kcl.ac.uk>, Andy <andydesignux@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <f20a56bb-d8f2-7174-e8fe-c301d04c3f0b@w3.org>
Sure. ri > Julie Rawe <mailto:jrawe@understood.org> > 11 February 2025 at 18:16 > Hi, Ri and Jen, can I share this feedback with DJ, who is leading the > WCAG 3 team that is developing guidelines for line height and other > aspects of text appearance? > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 1:07 PM Jennifer Strickland > <jstrickland@mitre.org <mailto:jstrickland@mitre.org>> wrote: > Jennifer Strickland <mailto:jstrickland@mitre.org> > 11 February 2025 at 18:06 > > Hi Ri, > > I asked about this previously in AGWG and was told that the default > has been to have users adjust line-height, as some other need there > not to be as much spacing. Like you, I also prefer 1.5, yet there are > magnifier users that prefer less. The 1.2 was a compromise between > single and 1.5, I was told. > > Kindly, > Jen > > *From: *r12a <ishida@w3.org> > *Date: *Tuesday, February 11, 2025 at 12:45 PM > *To: *Jan McSorley <mcsorleyjan@gmail.com> > *Cc: *public-global-inclusion@w3.org <public-global-inclusion@w3.org>, > Jean Strohmier <jean.strohmier@gmail.com>, Katy Brickley > <katy.brickley@kcl.ac.uk>, Andy <andydesignux@gmail.com> > *Subject: *[EXT] Line height in resources pointed to > > I followed the link to the COGA Personas document (which is good), but > found it quite difficult to read because the lines were so close > together. The lines above and below tend to interfere with my reading > of the current line. Forgive me for > > I followed the link to the COGA Personas document (which is good), but > found it quite difficult to read because the lines were so close > together. The lines above and below tend to interfere with my reading > of the current line. Forgive me for not taking the time to look it > up, but i'm trying to get some other stuff done, but felt like i ought > to raise the issue. > > Line height is currently set to 1.2. Is that the recommendation? I > am able to read much more comfortably if the line height is set to 1.5 > or 1.6. > > By the way, line spacing requirements can be very different in > non-Latin scripts. I don't have data on specifically what the > expected line heights would be for particular scripts, but i wonder > whether it may be a useful exercise to see how the character heights > tend to compare to Latin characters. If you are interested, i suggest > to go to https://r12a.github.io/scripts/switch.html > <https://urldefense.us/v2/url?u=https-3A__r12a.github.io_scripts_switch.html&d=DwMDaQ&c=Al8V6E3U0yBSSEuVtdZbGtsvjPA49U3WmtZAsdW0D_Q&r=9YhmB_5SEixabDOvfR-id9wLtNqq8zm1GDKE6CqLIUY&m=QJLWsTXKCM_8lDwg2vAvGjAABGe9ZJMzt5tpRKVc_8_dfKTCjmN6MQMG51xYZpKU&s=m1OuG7cKgkunkLRGCsbDwYy7hYdYi6WKgcslaXy8kYM&e=> > and use the pulldown to select the fragment id "Baselines, line > height, etc.". You can then select various orthographies using one of > the select controls just above. It may not, as i say, give useable > data for line height preferences, but it may give you a feeling for > relative glyph sizes that will help as background. > > Note, also that some scripts, like Thai, generally expect additional > space between lines compared to Latin text, by convention. And other > scripts such as Japanese need space for annotations to occur > over/below the line without changing the height of any given line. > > hth > ri > > > > r12a <mailto:ishida@w3.org> > 11 February 2025 at 17:43 > I followed the link to the COGA Personas document (which is good), but > found it quite difficult to read because the lines were so close > together. The lines above and below tend to interfere with my reading > of the current line. Forgive me for not taking the time to look it > up, but i'm trying to get some other stuff done, but felt like i ought > to raise the issue. > > Line height is currently set to 1.2. Is that the recommendation? I > am able to read much more comfortably if the line height is set to 1.5 > or 1.6. > > By the way, line spacing requirements can be very different in > non-Latin scripts. I don't have data on specifically what the > expected line heights would be for particular scripts, but i wonder > whether it may be a useful exercise to see how the character heights > tend to compare to Latin characters. If you are interested, i suggest > to go to https://r12a.github.io/scripts/switch.html and use the > pulldown to select the fragment id "Baselines, line height, etc.". > You can then select various orthographies using one of the select > controls just above. It may not, as i say, give useable data for line > height preferences, but it may give you a feeling for relative glyph > sizes that will help as background. > > Note, also that some scripts, like Thai, generally expect additional > space between lines compared to Latin text, by convention. And other > scripts such as Japanese need space for annotations to occur > over/below the line without changing the height of any given line. > > hth > ri > >
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2025 06:14:05 UTC