hi Jen,
I worry that the compromise may be producing a situation that suits
neither party, and forces everyone to take corrective action.
ri
> Jennifer Strickland <mailto:jstrickland@mitre.org>
> 11 February 2025 at 18:06
>
> Hi Ri,
>
> I asked about this previously in AGWG and was told that the default
> has been to have users adjust line-height, as some other need there
> not to be as much spacing. Like you, I also prefer 1.5, yet there are
> magnifier users that prefer less. The 1.2 was a compromise between
> single and 1.5, I was told.
>
> Kindly,
> Jen
>
> *From: *r12a <ishida@w3.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 11, 2025 at 12:45 PM
> *To: *Jan McSorley <mcsorleyjan@gmail.com>
> *Cc: *public-global-inclusion@w3.org <public-global-inclusion@w3.org>,
> Jean Strohmier <jean.strohmier@gmail.com>, Katy Brickley
> <katy.brickley@kcl.ac.uk>, Andy <andydesignux@gmail.com>
> *Subject: *[EXT] Line height in resources pointed to
>
> I followed the link to the COGA Personas document (which is good), but
> found it quite difficult to read because the lines were so close
> together. The lines above and below tend to interfere with my reading
> of the current line. Forgive me for
>
> I followed the link to the COGA Personas document (which is good), but
> found it quite difficult to read because the lines were so close
> together. The lines above and below tend to interfere with my reading
> of the current line. Forgive me for not taking the time to look it
> up, but i'm trying to get some other stuff done, but felt like i ought
> to raise the issue.
>
> Line height is currently set to 1.2. Is that the recommendation? I
> am able to read much more comfortably if the line height is set to 1.5
> or 1.6.
>