- From: João Paulo Almeida <jpandradealmeida@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:18:46 -0200
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-gld-wg@w3.org" <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
I'll follow Dave on this. João Paulo > On 25/10/2013, at 05:58, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 24/10/13 23:42, Hadley Beeman wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In today's meeting, we voted to transition DCAT to Candidate Rec. [1] >> >> Because the transition vote wasn't on the agenda for today's meeting to give you advance warning of the vote, we wanted to check with those of you who didn't attend. >> >> IN THE NEXT 24 HOURS, could you please respond to the group and tell us if you support the resolution, below? (A reply saying "+1" would be sufficient.) >> >> RESOLUTION: Advance DCAT to Candidate Recommendation, with the exit criteria of each term in the dcat namespace being properly used by two or more data sources. [1] > > As noted by Sandro we haven't even responded to some of the LC2 commenters, let alone obtained an acknowledgement. > > So +1 to CR conditional on that being done. > > I'm unclear on what the response to some of the comments would be. In particular what is the intention with regards to Leigh's suggestion (which I rather like)? > > Dave > >
Received on Saturday, 26 October 2013 20:28:30 UTC