Re: Best Practices editors: to-do list & timelines - For tomorrow's meeting

Hi Richard,
> If a WG member threatens a formal objection, then obviously consensus was not reached.
>
I didn't know it was as simple as you said. Thanks !!
>> >Do we need to raise an issue here and vote today, or this was already done? Any pointer? Chairs?
> It's pretty clear that a vote would only reveal that Dave sustains his objection.
>
> There seem to be three ways of moving forward:
>
> 1. Those who really want to keep the procurement section need to convince Dave of its value or work on its contents to make the section acceptable to him.
> 2. You could try to wear him down and sneak the document past him when he doesn't pay attention.
> 3. The editors could drop the section and publish it somewhere else (wiki, blog, etc.)
>
> My preference would be for 3.
Actually, I remove it as we need to move forward.
The current version is here [1].

@Dave: It could be great if you can start reviewing this version as I 
guess we will go through your comments. Thanks in advance!

Cheers,

Ghislain

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html


-- 
Ghislain Atemezing
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
Campus SophiaTech
450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin

Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 09:43:54 UTC