- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:23:49 +0000
- To: public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 20/11/13 11:57, Phil Archer wrote:
> Bernadette, Boris, Ghislain,
> The procurement checklist is very US-centric ('federal-wide') is the
> give away ;-) But the thing that's missing from the list is use of open
> standards. I would add:
>
> * Does the software use open standards for data exchange?
> * Is the service replaceable with a competing service with a minimum of
> disruption? (i.e. avoid vendor lock-in).
I have lost track of the number of times I have objected to the
procurement section being in there at all. My position on that has not
changed.
Dave
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 12:24:18 UTC