Thanks, I'll include Tom Baker in the outreach as he is definitely a "DCMI person" :-) and overall great LD advocate & practitioner. Cheers, Bernadette On Mar 20, 2013, at 6:21 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > On 19 Mar 2013, at 22:55, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I tend to think of DC Elements as referring to 1.0 and DC Terms to >>>> 1.1. Certainly the page you link to is called "dmci-terms". >>>> >>>> Suggest s/Element Set/Metadata Terms/ in both title and body. >>> >>> Good catch. How about we just stick with the core 15 terms widely used. >>> Are you OK with this? >> >> I would prefer to refer to "Dublin Core Metadata Terms". There has been a preference for using DCT rather than old DC elements in all the public sector I've been involved in for some years. >> >> However, I'm not a DCMI person, presumably there's others in the group better placed to advise on correct terminology. > > I'm not a DCMI person either, but remember seeing a statement from DCMI that discourages use of the old namespace. I agree that we should refer to the new namespace, and agree to Dave's proposed change. > > Richard
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:53:39 UTC