W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Feedback on LD glossary

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:21:53 +0000
Cc: public-gld-wg@w3.org, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <8CD239F0-15C9-4BE5-AD57-618A9DE4FACA@cyganiak.de>
To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
On 19 Mar 2013, at 22:55, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I tend to think of DC Elements as referring to 1.0 and DC Terms to
>>> 1.1. Certainly the page you link to is called "dmci-terms".
>>> 
>>> Suggest s/Element Set/Metadata Terms/ in both title and body.
>> 
>> Good catch.  How about we just stick with the core 15 terms widely used.
>>  Are you OK with this?
> 
> I would prefer to refer to "Dublin Core Metadata Terms". There has been a preference for using DCT rather than old DC elements in all the public sector I've been involved in for some years.
> 
> However, I'm not a DCMI person, presumably there's others in the group better placed to advise on correct terminology.

I'm not a DCMI person either, but remember seeing a statement from DCMI that discourages use of the old namespace. I agree that we should refer to the new namespace, and agree to Dave's proposed change.

Richard
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:22:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:38 UTC