W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Request for pre-review of Linked Data Glossary

From: Jindřich Mynarz <jindrich.mynarz@vse.cz>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:38:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE=8Bu9H_GQq+RyG+nin=97qY2Q1qyX8wHaMQBTQkkcPFL4vCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: W3C public GLD WG WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi,

there's a duplicate entry for the term "Resource" (no. 77 and 84). I
suggest resolving this by dropping the definition under the number 84,
which is too restrictive (cf. definition of "resource" in RDF 1.1 Concepts:
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#resources-and-statements).

The entry for "descriptor resource" (no. 28) isn't very clear. Is it meant
to describe "resource representation"?

Best,

Jindrich

-- 
Jindrich Mynarz
http://keg.vse.cz/resource/person/jindrich-mynarz

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:50 PM, James McKinney <james@opennorth.ca> wrote:

> 1. 5 Star Linked Data
>
> Isn't the format used by Microsoft Excel no longer proprietary?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Open_XML
>
> It's also a bit jarring to find an advertisement for the linked data mug
> after the first item in the glossary.
>
> 2. 5 Star Linked Data Diagram
>
> I would merge this in with "5 Star Linked Data". I'd never heard of the
> diagram, and I'm not sure there really is one canonical diagram.
>
> 8. CKAN
>
> If we are going to list CKAN, should we not list others like Socrata? I
> would opt to not include any specific vendor.
>
> 16. curl
>
> curl can retrieve any data over a wide variety of protocols, not just
> machine readable content. The example here is inappropriate. It should
> appear under the definition for 55. Machine Readable Data. If that's done,
> remove the link to "curl" from 25. DBPedia.
>
> 21. Data Cloud
>
> "directoies" typo
>
> OK, read the first 25 for now.
>
> James
>
> On 2013-03-18, at 5:34 PM, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Per our last telecon on Thursday (14-Mar), we agreed to do an internal
> sanity check on the glossary before moving this to a WG Note.  Later this
> week I plan to reach out to a number of authors of references on Linked
> Data for peer review, (i,e., J. Hendler, C. Bizer, T. Heath, D. Wood, M.
> Zaidman, et al.) once the GLD WG has reviewed.
> >
> > Please consider reviewing the 122 glossary terms [1] prior this Thursday
> call, that would be very helpful.  Please keep in mind the target audience
> for this LD glossary is Web developers coming up the curve on basic
> concepts around publishing data on the Web as LOD, it is not intended as an
> academic reference per se.
> >
> > The editors will take the lead on folding in feedback asap.  Please cut
> & paste the current & proposed language & reply to this thread.
> >
> > We'd link the terms to other deliverables including the vocabularies and
> BP docs during the LC process, and encourage cross linking with dependency
> and liaison groups in due course.
> >
> > Thank you in advance for your time reviewing the LD glossary.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bernadette Hyland, co-chair
> > W3C Government Linked Data Working Group
> > Charter: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/
> >
> > [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html
>
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 22:38:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:38 UTC